One of the most common questions I get from app developers running Apple Search Ads is: "Are my numbers good?" It is a fair question. Without benchmarks, you are flying blind - optimizing campaigns without knowing whether your tap-through rate, conversion rate, or cost per tap is above or below the industry average.
In this guide, I have compiled the latest Apple Search Ads benchmarks across TTR, CR, CPT, and CPI - broken down by quarter and by App Store category. These numbers come from aggregated campaign data across thousands of apps and millions in ad spend. I will also explain what each metric means, how to interpret benchmarks correctly, and where to find your own profitability thresholds.
Important caveat: Benchmarks are directional, not targets. Your numbers will be different based on your app, geo mix, keyword strategy, and creative assets. Use these as a reference point to identify potential issues - not as goals to chase blindly.
In this article
- Key Metrics Explained
- TTR (Tap-Through Rate) Benchmarks
- TTR by App Store Category
- CR (Conversion Rate) Benchmarks
- CR by App Store Category
- CPT (Cost Per Tap) Benchmarks
- CPI (Cost Per Install) - Why You Don't Need Benchmarks
- Profitability: ARPPU and Trial-to-Paid
- How to Use These Benchmarks
- Final Thoughts
Key Metrics Explained
Before diving into the numbers, let me define the four core Apple Search Ads metrics we will cover:
- TTR (Tap-Through Rate) - The percentage of users who see your ad and tap on it. Formula: Taps / Impressions. This measures how compelling your app listing looks in search results.
- CR (Conversion Rate) - The percentage of users who tap your ad and then install the app. Formula: Installs / Taps. This reflects how well your product page converts visitors.
- CPT (Cost Per Tap) - How much you pay on average for each tap on your ad. This is determined by the second-price auction and your bid relative to competitors.
- CPI (Cost Per Install) - Your total cost to acquire one install. Formula: Total Spend / Installs. This is the metric most people focus on, but as I will explain, it is the least useful one to benchmark.
TTR (Tap-Through Rate) Benchmarks
Tap-through rate tells you how attractive your app listing appears when it shows up in search results. A low TTR means users are seeing your ad but not tapping - which usually points to issues with your app icon, title, subtitle, or screenshot set.
Average TTR by Quarter (2024)
| Quarter | Average TTR | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 2024 | 9.80% | Highest |
| Q2 2024 | 8.90% | Decline |
| Q3 2024 | 9.00% | Slight recovery |
| Q4 2024 | 8.60% | Lowest |
The overall average TTR hovers around 9%. Q1 typically sees the highest TTR because users who just got new devices in the holiday season are actively searching for apps. Q4 tends to dip as competition increases during the holiday advertising rush, pushing more ads into view and diluting tap rates.
If your TTR is significantly below 9%, your creative assets likely need work. If it is above 12-15%, you are doing well - but make sure your conversion rate supports it (high TTR with low CR means your product page is not delivering on what the ad promised).
TTR by App Store Category
TTR varies dramatically across categories. Some niches naturally see higher engagement because users have strong intent and fewer choices. Here is the breakdown:
| Category | TTR (iPhone) | TTR (iPad) |
|---|---|---|
| Reference | 19.66% | - |
| Entertainment | 15.20% | 27.86% |
| Music | 11.93% | 10.86% |
| Health & Fitness | 11.84% | 12.39% |
| Food & Drink | 11.39% | 12.64% |
| Utilities | 11.39% | 10.28% |
| Business | 10.29% | 12.44% |
| Productivity | 10.21% | 11.82% |
| Photo & Video | 10.01% | 8.95% |
| Shopping | 9.94% | 7.71% |
| Lifestyle | 9.74% | 11.27% |
| Sports | 9.42% | 20.46% |
| Travel | 8.58% | - |
| Education | 8.05% | - |
| Games | 7.72% | - |
A few standout observations:
- Reference apps lead at 19.66% TTR - Users searching for dictionaries, encyclopedias, and guides have very high intent and fewer alternatives.
- Entertainment on iPad hits 27.86% - Streaming and media apps on iPad see exceptionally high engagement, likely because iPad is the preferred device for content consumption.
- Sports on iPad reaches 20.46% - Sports fans searching on iPad are highly engaged, possibly during live events.
- Games have the lowest TTR at 7.72% - The Games category is extremely crowded with many competing options, which naturally drives down per-app tap rates.
What to do if your TTR is below your category average: Start with your app icon and first screenshot. These are the two elements users see in search results before they tap. A/B test different variations using Custom Product Pages to isolate what drives taps.
CR (Conversion Rate) Benchmarks
Conversion rate measures how well your product page turns tappers into installers. Apple Search Ads tends to have very high conversion rates compared to other ad channels because users are actively searching for apps - the intent is already there.
Average CR by Quarter (2024)
| Quarter | Average CR | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 2024 | 65.46% | Highest |
| Q2 2024 | 62.94% | Lowest |
| Q3 2024 | 63.98% | Recovery |
| Q4 2024 | 63.85% | Stable |
The average conversion rate across all categories sits around 64%. That means roughly two out of every three people who tap on an Apple Search Ads result end up installing the app. This is remarkably high compared to other paid acquisition channels where conversion rates of 2-5% are typical.
Q1 again leads here, driven by the post-holiday surge of new device owners. The quarterly variation is relatively small (about 2.5 percentage points), which means CR is more stable and predictable than TTR.
CR by App Store Category
Conversion rate by category tells you how well product pages convert in each vertical. High-CR categories tend to have clear value propositions and strong user intent.
| Category | CR (iPhone) | CR (iPad) |
|---|---|---|
| Entertainment | 74.80% | 79.88% |
| Food & Drink | 73.60% | 75.38% |
| Sports | 72.40% | 65.33% |
| Shopping | 71.80% | 67.04% |
| Social | 71.80% | 63.24% |
| Reference | 69.50% | - |
| Travel | 69.30% | 67.62% |
| Photo & Video | 69.20% | 69.61% |
| Health & Fitness | 68.10% | 67.12% |
| Business | 67.30% | 67.58% |
| Lifestyle | 66.10% | 69.57% |
| Utilities | 65.90% | 62.41% |
| Music | 65.30% | 64.55% |
| Graphics & Design | 61.10% | 59.61% |
| Productivity | 59.50% | 61.60% |
Key insights from the conversion rate data:
- Entertainment leads with 74.80% on iPhone and 79.88% on iPad - Users searching for streaming and media apps typically know what they want and convert quickly.
- Food & Drink is close behind at 73.60% - When someone searches for a food delivery or recipe app, they have immediate intent to use it.
- Productivity has the lowest CR at 59.50% - Productivity is a broad, competitive category where users compare multiple options before committing.
- iPad CR is often different from iPhone - Some categories like Lifestyle convert better on iPad (69.57% vs 66.10%), while others like Sports convert worse (65.33% vs 72.40%). Consider separate campaigns by device.
If your CR is below your category average: Your product page is the bottleneck. Focus on your first three screenshots, app preview video, ratings, and description. Use Custom Product Pages to tailor the experience for different keyword groups.
CPT (Cost Per Tap) Benchmarks
Cost per tap reflects how much competition exists in the auction for your targeted keywords. Higher CPT means more advertisers are bidding on the same terms.
Average CPT by Quarter (2024)
| Quarter | Average CPT | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 2024 | $1.38 | Post-holiday baseline |
| Q2 2024 | $1.37 | Stable |
| Q3 2024 | $1.34 | Lowest |
| Q4 2024 | $1.51 | Holiday spike |
The average CPT across all categories and geos sits around $1.40, with Q4 spiking to $1.51 as advertisers increase budgets for the holiday season. Q3 tends to be the cheapest quarter - a good time to test new keywords and scale campaigns before holiday competition kicks in.
CPT Varies Significantly by Geography
One of the most important things to understand about CPT is that it varies dramatically by geography. As a general rule, smaller geos have CPTs roughly 1.5x lower than tier-1 markets like the US, UK, and Australia.
This means if the average US CPT is $1.40, you might see CPTs of $0.80-$1.00 in markets like Germany, France, or Japan - and even lower in emerging markets. This is one reason why geographic targeting strategy matters so much for Apple Search Ads efficiency.
CPT optimization tip: CPT is influenced by your relevance score, conversion rate, and bid amount. Improving your app's metadata and product page can actually lower your CPT, because Apple rewards relevance with better ad placements at lower costs.
CPI (Cost Per Install) - Why You Don't Need Benchmarks
Here is where I diverge from the typical benchmarks article. I am going to tell you something that might be surprising: you do not need CPI benchmarks.
CPI varies so dramatically by geography, niche, keyword type, and competition level that any average number is essentially meaningless for your specific situation. A brand keyword CPI might be $0.30, while a generic category keyword CPI could be $3.00+ in the same app. A US CPI might be 5x higher than an Indonesia CPI for the same keyword.
Instead of comparing your CPI to an industry average, focus on what actually matters:
- Compare CPI to your ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) - This tells you whether each install is profitable.
- Calculate your payback period - How many days or months until the revenue from an acquired user covers their acquisition cost?
- Track CPI by keyword group - Brand keywords, category keywords, competitor keywords, and discovery keywords will each have very different CPIs. Benchmark against yourself, not the industry.
- Monitor CPI trends over time - A rising CPI in a stable campaign usually means increased competition. A falling CPI might mean improved relevance.
The formula that matters is simple: if your LTV (Lifetime Value) > CPI, the campaign is profitable. Everything else is noise.
Profitability: ARPPU and Trial-to-Paid Benchmarks
Since CPI benchmarks are not particularly useful, what should you benchmark instead? The answer is your revenue metrics. Understanding average ARPPU (Average Revenue Per Paying User) and trial-to-paid conversion rates by category gives you a much better framework for evaluating whether your Apple Search Ads campaigns are actually profitable.
Why ARPPU Matters More Than CPI
RevenueCat publishes annual benchmarks on subscription app economics. Knowing the typical ARPPU in your category helps you set a ceiling for acceptable CPI. If apps in your category generate $50 in ARPPU and your trial-to-paid rate is 20%, your effective revenue per install is $10. That means any CPI below $10 is technically profitable.
Trial-to-Paid Benchmarks by Category
Trial-to-paid conversion is the other critical variable. Across the subscription app ecosystem, trial-to-paid rates vary widely:
- Health & Fitness - Tends to see higher trial-to-paid rates, driven by strong motivation and habit-forming features.
- Productivity - Moderate conversion, as users often try multiple tools before committing.
- Entertainment - Generally lower trial-to-paid since free content alternatives exist.
- Utilities - Higher conversion when the app solves a clear, immediate problem.
The key insight: your CPI target should be derived from your own unit economics (LTV, ARPPU, trial-to-paid), not from industry CPI averages.
Profitability formula: Target CPI = LTV x Target ROAS. If your LTV is $15 and you want a 2x ROAS, your maximum CPI should be $7.50. This is far more useful than knowing the "average" CPI in your category.
How to Use These Benchmarks
Now that you have the data, here is a practical framework for using benchmarks to improve your Apple Search Ads campaigns:
1. Diagnose Problems, Don't Set Targets
If your TTR is 4% and the category average is 11%, you have a clear creative problem. If your CR is 45% and the average is 70%, your product page needs work. Benchmarks help you identify where to focus - not what number to aim for.
2. Use the Funnel Approach
Work through the funnel systematically:
- Impressions - Are you getting enough? If not, increase bids or expand keywords.
- TTR - Compare to category average. Low TTR = creative/metadata issue.
- CR - Compare to category average. Low CR = product page issue.
- CPI - Compare to your own ARPU/LTV, not industry benchmarks.
3. Segment Your Analysis
Never look at aggregate benchmarks alone. Break your data down by:
- Device type - iPhone vs iPad performance can be very different (as the data above shows).
- Geography - Tier-1 markets behave differently from emerging markets.
- Keyword type - Brand, category, competitor, and discovery keywords each have their own benchmark ranges.
- Match type - Exact Match vs Broad Match will show different TTR and CR patterns.
4. Track Trends, Not Snapshots
A single week of data means nothing. Track your metrics month-over-month and quarter-over-quarter. Seasonal patterns (like the Q4 CPT spike) are normal and expected. What matters is the long-term trend relative to your profitability thresholds.
Need Help Interpreting Your Numbers?
Join 3,000+ app developers getting weekly insights on Apple Search Ads optimization, benchmarks, and growth strategy.
Subscribe to NewsletterFinal Thoughts
Apple Search Ads benchmarks are a powerful diagnostic tool when used correctly. The average TTR of ~9%, CR of ~64%, and CPT of ~$1.40 give you a baseline to compare against - but always filter through the lens of your specific category, geography, and keyword strategy.
The most important takeaway: benchmarks are directional, not targets. A Reference app with a 19% TTR and a Games app with a 7% TTR can both be highly profitable if their unit economics work. Your job is not to hit the industry average - it is to build a profitable acquisition machine where LTV consistently exceeds CPI.
Focus on optimizing your full funnel (impressions, TTR, CR, and revenue per user), compare your metrics to the category-specific data in this article, and always tie performance back to profitability. That is how you turn Apple Search Ads benchmarks from interesting data into actionable strategy.
If you want help auditing your Apple Search Ads performance against these benchmarks, or need guidance on building profitable campaigns from scratch, check out my services.